|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
354
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 13:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Heh. I want one. Mentioned it in F&I
Something that's not on a totally different training track, and a lower asset risk, rather than traveling half empty.
The discussion https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=53470 FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
354
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 14:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tarn Kugisa wrote:If you haul stuff a lot you might have Racial Industrial to V, and after that it only takes about an hour of training. I'd train for it right now if the skillbooks didn't cost over 100 million for the pair.
That gap isn't skills. It's size (and speed).
Something in between, that doesn't require a totally different training plan is what's being asked for. Quite happy for it to take the same skills as a freighter, as is the OP FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
362
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 19:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
I don't think it should be a step between skills wise. Just size wize.
You don't use a container truck to move something you could move in a panel van, but is too big for a pickup. Just looking for more ships to be opened up by the skill. FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
362
|
Posted - 2012.04.21 02:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Stonkeep wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:I don't think it should be a step between skills wise. Just size wize.
I can agree to that, like I said before it can be T2 or T3, it does not matter. Infinite Force wrote: Should cost LESS than a freighter, otherwise, an Orca will just be used - isn't that what we're trying to get around here?
It should definitely cost MORE or there won't be much point to Freighters and Jump Freighters.
Less. The point of Freighters is they can carry a **** load. The point of Jump freighters is that they can jump.
the point of the mini freighter is: a: more agile/faster than a freighter. b: you aren't risking a stupid amount of isk, to move a lot less than full volume FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
556
|
Posted - 2012.08.08 22:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mos7Wan7ed wrote:you guys want the ship to cost less then a freighter, be less gankable then a freighter, and carry 220k m3? I got 2 letters for you...
OP
I'm happy with the speed of freighters. I'd like a little faster alignment time. Less ehp is a given. half would work for me. FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |
|
|
|